viparyaya – reverse
abhāvāt – non-appearance
Yes, because it has already been established that the effect (Manifest) exists in its cause (Unmanifest).
- My direct (and shared with others) experience of the Manifest (Vyakta) confirms the existence of the three Gunas.
- The following qualities attributed to the Manifest (and shared by the Unmanifest – see verse 11) originate with the Gunas:
- Inseparable: The Gunas cannot be separated from each other, they are intertwined.
- Objective: The experience of the Gunas is a shared experience.
- Non-intelligent: The Gunas merely fluctuate without sentience.
- Productive: The fluctuations of the Gunas produce objects.
- These qualities (inseparable, objective, non-intelligent and productive) are endowed by the Gunas to the Manifest.
- Because of my direct experiences (of pleasure, pain and delusion) of the Manifest, I know first hand that the Manifest has the qualities of the Gunas.
- However, my direct experience cannot attest to the presence of the Gunas in the Unmanifest (Avyakta).
- How then can I know that the Unmanifest also has these qualities?
- Black thread can only produce black cloth, it cannot produce red cloth. Similarly, whatever produces a Manifest that has the above mentioned qualities, must also have these qualities.
- Whatever does not possess these qualities also does not possess the three Gunas.
- It has been established that an effect exists in its pre-existing cause (see verse 9). Since the Gunas and their qualities are inherent in the Manifest (the effect), I can infer that they must also be inherent in the Unmanifest (the cause).
- Since the Unmanifest is that which causes the Manifest, it too must be endowed with the qualities of the three Gunas.
